We have installed ReadSpeaker’s webReader, which allows visitors to instantly convert online content to audio on our website.
Click on the icon above to try this out, and take advantage of the full range of useful webReader features by clicking the link below.
Readspeaker website
This accessibility statement applies to www.audit.wales. This website is run by Audit Wales. We want as many people as possible to be able to use this website.
View accessibility statement
We’re always looking to improve the accessibility of this website. If you find any problems not listed on this page or think we’re not meeting accessibility requirements, contact:
info@audit.wales
Our review looked at whether the performance information provided to senior leaders helps them to understand the perspective of service users and the outcomes of councils’ activities so that they can manage their performance effectively
Our review focused on the main reports councils use to help senior leaders monitor and manage their performance.
Councils put a lot of effort into producing these reports, which are often in the public domain. We did this review at all 22 councils in Wales. Councils deliver services to the public using public money. It is vital councils understand the impact of their activities and policies to know if they are using public money wisely and achieving what they set out to achieve.
Our findings were similar across most councils: that few councils were putting service user perspective information at the core of their reporting and reports tended to focus on outputs rather than outcomes. We have generally made the same recommendations, or variations of them to most councils:
Whilst this review was not about councils’ performance management arrangements as such, our findings raise fundamental questions about the effectiveness of those arrangements. It is difficult to see how some councils are managing performance effectively if they do not report information on outcomes and the perspective of service users.
I hoped to find a more positive picture than we did as the importance of understanding outcomes and the perspective of service users has been emphasised for years. These are arguably the most important aspects of a council’s performance management arrangements. This review casts doubt on whether councils have proper arrangements to secure economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the use of their resources. I expect to find an improved position when we follow up on our recommendations.